Is delayed cord clamping in preterm infants as safe as immediate clamping regarding 2‐years outcomes?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended for premature infants to improve blood volume. Most preterm infants are born by cesarean delivery (CD), and placental transfusion may be less effective than in vaginal delivery (VD). We sought to determine whether infants <32 weeks born by CD who undergo umbilical cord milking (UCM) have higher measures of systemic blood flow t...
متن کاملImmediate or early cord clamping vs delayed clamping.
Over the past 40 years, there have been a number of review articles attempting to rationalise cord clamping practice. Early cord clamping was originally thought to be important in active management of the third stage of labour, but this was never evidence based. Without an evidence base to justify it, early cord clamping in clinical practice has remained very variable. There is good evidence th...
متن کامل[Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in preterm infants].
BACKGROUND Optimal timing for clamping of the umbilical cord at birth is unclear. Early clamping allows for immediate resuscitation of the newborn. Delaying clamping may facilitate transfusion of blood between the placenta and the baby. OBJECTIVES To delineate the short- and long-term effects for infants born at less than 37 completed weeks' gestation, and their mothers, of early compared to ...
متن کاملIs "Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping" Beneficial for Premature Newborns?
Background: The appropriate moment for clamping the umbilical cord is controversial. Immediate cord clamping (ICC) is an item of active management of the third stage of labor (AMTSL). Unclamped umbilical cord may cause inconvenience in preterm neonates because they commonly need some levels of emergent services. Some studies revealed delayed cord clamping (DCC) of preterm neonates results in be...
متن کاملPreterm Birth: Effect of Corticosteroids or Immediate Cord Clamping?
Joal Hill I read with interest the debate about for-profi t versus non-profi t institutional review boards (IRBs) [1], but was disappointed that no one addressed the ability (or inability) of for-profi t IRBs to review studies with the local context of research subjects in mind and then monitor what actually occurs during the consent process throughout the research trial. To my mind the “bignes...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Acta Paediatrica
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0803-5253,1651-2227
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15245